Biden Cancer Reveals New Democrat Justice

Revelations of cognition and precognition

Minority Report is a science fiction crime drama set in a not-too-distant future that features clairvoyants known as “Precogs” who are employed to predict crimes so that would-be criminals can be identified, located, and apprehended before actually committing a crime.

In light of the response to some recent news about former president Joe Biden’s advanced cancer diagnosis, Precogs may just be our only hope. Based on the absurd rhetoric of Democratic Party leadership, logic dictates that Precogs are the only path to dealing with crime. Let’s consider what Democratic House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has to say when asked about the Democratic Party being closed off to discussing Biden’s age in 2024:

“My thoughts and prayers have been extended to President Biden. It is a painful moment for him and his family. It is a very serious diagnosis. My expectation is President Biden is going to meet this moment with the courage and resilience that he’s consistently shown. It seems to me entirely inappropriate that at this moment in time, when President Biden is dealing with a serious and aggressive form of cancer, that Republicans who are peddling conspiracy theories and want us to look backward at a time when they are actually taking healthcare away from the American people. No, as House Democrats, we are going to look forward. They literally are trying to take healthcare away from millions of Americans at this very moment in the dead of night! And Republicans want to fan the flames of conspiracy theories at this moment? No, thank you.”

First, it is not just Republicans who want answers. Americans of all political and cultural stripes want answers. We want to understand the impacts of Biden’s undeniable cognitive decline that we all observed going as far back as before the 2020 election. And we ALL saw it, including Democrats. So that was not really a conspiracy, was it? If Biden’s cognition impacted the governance of the most powerful nation in the world, do Americans deserve to know? Do we deserve to understand the degree to which that impairment impacted the rest of us? Do we deserve to know if the Biden administration committed any crimes during his tenure in the White House?

Despite our suspicions, we don’t know how many crimes were indeed committed by Biden and his administration, but the Democratic Party has adopted the philosophy that we do not “look backward” to address such potential crimes. This leaves only one option for stopping crime: CLAIRVOYANCE! Oh, to be a Democrat!

The Diagnosis

The news coming from the Biden family is that Joe recently received a diagnosis of advanced prostate cancer, which has metastasized to his bones. This is grave news for the former president.

The response from the medical community has been informative. Even within the mainstream liberal media, the message from medical experts has been consistent. That message is this: there is NO way that this is a new diagnosis if a man of his age was undergoing routine screening.

Recall that we have been receiving reports from his doctor that he was in tip-top shape throughout his presidency.

Were his doctors lying, committing malpractice, or just incompetent? The president tends to have access to the best doctors in the game, so it seems unlikely that malpractice or incompetence were at play. That points us to the conclusion that Biden’s doctors were lying. That is not conspiracy, that is just a logical thought process. And that logic leads us to the next question:

If we can’t trust the president’s doctors on his general health, how can we trust any assessments of his cognition?

Sympathy

For the most part, the response from the non-Democrat-aligned contingent of media (both mainstream and independent) has been sympathetic for Joe Biden, the man. Outside of the Democrat-fueled rhetoric, there is a general sense that the public must decouple the feeling of sympathy associated with Biden’s cancer from the need for answers. As Hakeem Jeffries illustrated with his comments above, the Democrats are shamefully using this cancer diagnosis strategically to redirect attention away from the Biden cognition questions.

However, sympathy is not requisite. Nobody should feel obligated to have sympathy for a man who has supported every major military conflict for decades and is thus responsible (at least in part) for unimaginable amounts of bloodshed and hundreds of thousands of deaths. Biden has a legacy of death and destruction. That is not a suggestion that sympathy is inappropriate, either. Perhaps there is nothing wrong with feeling sympathy for the man, but he does not suddenly and automatically become a sympathetic figure because of this diagnosis.

Validating Hur’s Assertions

Special Counsel Robert Hur interviewed President Biden in October 2023 regarding the case of illegally keeping classified documents at his personal home in an unsecured environment. Hur decided not to take Biden to trial partly based on his conclusion that jurors would likely view him as "a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory." Hur caught a lot of flak at the time, but that was before the recent release of the interview audio validated Hur’s conclusion. The audio confirms that Biden struggled to stay on topic, fumbled through sentences, and repeatedly brought up his son Beau even when off topic. Of his many tangential discussions, he talked about how then-president Barack Obama did not want Biden to run for president because he did not have the best chance of winning. One of the more damning moments regarding his cognition was when Biden got confused about Beau and when he died.

Among Hur’s critics following the interview was then-VP Kamala Harris. She called his report “inappropriate.” She said:

“The way that the president's demeanor in that report was characterized could not be more wrong on the facts and clearly politically motivated — gratuitous... We should expect that there would be a higher level of integrity than what we saw.”

It turns out that Hur was being rather generous with his characterization. It turns out VP Harris was lying to Americans. The recordings reveal Biden providing nonsensical responses to his interview. But Biden’s people turned the tables on Hur, responding with attacks.

The “Conspiracy”

Where does the “conspiracy” talk really come into this? It starts with this question: If Biden’s cognitive issues impaired his ability to preside over the United States, do we deserve to understand how the role of the President was actually fulfilled?

You see, executive decisions were being made despite President Biden not having the wits about him to complete sentences, find his way off a stage, or face toward the camera for a photo. Someone was making executive decisions. Someone actually was presiding, but more and more evidence suggests it was not Biden. If not Biden, then who was calling the shots?

His VP, his press secretary, and anyone from his administration or his party that would speak publicly about him… well, they all just covered for him. The propagandist liberal media would do their part too, of course. “He is sharp,” they would say. They would lash out at anyone who hinted at a cognitive decline. If anyone would point out what became increasingly obvious were Biden’s failing faculties, they would cry “Agism!”

If an administration, a political party, and a biased subset of the national media were coordinated in the goal of manipulating public perspective of the president’s health through lies and misdirection, does that not constitute a “conspiracy”? If this coordinated effort enabled others to do the job of the president, does that not constitute a conspiracy?

The Autopen and The Open Door For Legal Challenges

Additional narrative that Biden was not calling the shots in the White House comes in the form of the autopen story. An autopen is a mechanical device capable of replicating someone’s signature. It has been used by presidents in the past, starting with Barack Obama. That was an outstanding situation, with a pressing deadline in D.C. while he was on a golf course in Hawaii. The Supreme Court said the autopen was valid for the president to use. So, why the fuss?

The distinguishing detail in the case of the autopen used to sign Biden’s name is his awareness of its use. Obama knew it was happening and approved it. Per the Hur interview, Biden cannot remember what year his son died, so don’t count on him to remember every autopen signature to which he agreed.

It was in the final hours of Biden’s presidency when the autopen was used to preemptively pardon his family and others (including the wealthiest bureaucrat in the land, Dr. Anthony Fauci). That was also when Biden’s cognition was most severely compromised. Did he approve of the pardons? Was he aware of the autopen signature? Unlike Obama, he was physically present to sign, so why was an autopen necessary? Perhaps because he was not mentally present?

This is why doubt shrouds those pardons. The autopen is a small part of a bigger story about the legality of Biden’s decisions. If the autopen pardons are tossed out, what other decisions are in peril? How far back can we demonstrate that Biden’s cognition was at least partially absent?

From a spectator’s perspective, this is some fascinating political theater. In terms of questioning the validity of an autopen used to sign the name of someone who is mentally incapacitated, there seems to be a case. Consider a senile grandpa. It would be unacceptable if you used an autopen to sign grandpa’s car over to you, wouldn’t it? The same notion seemingly applies with the president, although the stakes are much higher. Whatever the outcome, it really will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Where Was His Family?

Lost in a lot of the conversation about Biden these days, where the focus is on the failure of journalists and doctors, is the the question of where the hell Joe’s family was through all of this. It is rarely a doctor who identifies that cognitive issues are setting in. It is a family member who raises the first red flag. Where was President Biden’s family?

Right by his side.

Dr. Jill Biden was right there through this whole thing and she kept pretending like nothing was wrong. Does that make her a monster? We will leave it to you to decide.

Journalistic Stupidity

In what has turned into a potentially career-wrecking move, CNN anchor Jake Tapper made a decision to write a book about Biden’s mental decline. Tapper and Axios contributor Alex Thompson coauthored a book called Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again, in which they drop some super obvious ‘bombshells’ about Biden’s diminished faculties. As Tapper proceeds on his book tour, he is being absolutely eviscerated for his role in covering for Biden. There are examples upon examples of video from his CNN appearances in which Tapper defends the former president and attacks those who questioned Biden’s odd behavior and inability to complete sentences.

That brings us to a May 21st conversation on the Ezra Klein Show in which Tapper says the following:

If a president’s inner circle is willing to lie, and if they don’t even think they’re lying, that’s an incredibly dangerous thing. I wish I had like a solution here, the three things we need to do and like then this will never happen again. One of the things that we talk about in the book, and we have Jonathan Reiner a doctor at GW who is an advisor to the White House medical office, he says he thinks the White House medical report should be, um, affirmed under threat of perjury and given to Congress every year so there can be no lying or dissembling. But beyond that, what can we do? I, I don’t know.

How disgusting is that attitude from a news person? He is literally saying, as a news anchor or as a journalist, there is nothing we can do if the White House lies to us. This is complete idiotic nonsense. Jake, are you unable to ask questions for yourself? Are you unable to think for yourself? Are you unable to critically and objectively assess someone’s inability to verbally express a coherent thought? Are you unable to press those close to the president for more information? Are you unable to do what the independent media did for the past four-plus years and show videos of the mush-brained president? Are you unable to be inquire about why Biden was hidden for much of his presidency?

Jake Tapper, you are a fraud. May your career never recover from this shameful attempt to capitalize on your own failure as an American and a journalist.

Can you imagine how little information Americans would have access to if every journalist took the word of the White House or of any other politician? A real journalist should be skeptical of all information they receive, whether it comes from the White House, an expert in some field, or even their own boss. Skepticism is core to uncovering truth.

According to coauthor Alex Thompson, the book details how Biden’s aides were considering getting a wheelchair for the president because his physical condition had deteriorated so severely. The rest of us could see that as he shuffled around, fell off bikes, tumbled up stairs. But not Jake Tapper. No. After all, the White House told him President Biden was just fine.

On the Theoretical Aspect of the Conspiracy

Republicans, Independents, and anyone who was honestly assessing President Biden over the last few years could see he was mentally diminishing, increasingly as time passed. He was not up for the job. He was being propped up for the sake of the Democratic Party. Using the pandemic as cover, he barely even poked his head out of wherever he was hunkered down during his 2020 presidential campaign.

Yet so many Lefties, like Hakeem Jeffries, declare mere questions about the president’s health as conspiracy theories.

Calls for Biden to step down were met with denials. Then denials were bolstered by accusations — of political motivations, of headline fabrication, and of conspiracy theories. While there may have been political interest in pointing out the failing mind of a president, that does not make the situation any less of a reality. And, yes, all media desires eyeballs, so they pursue those salacious stories and bait potential audiences with captivating headlines — but that does not make the story of a president’s crumbling cognition any less true. Finally, when it seems evident that a group of people or an organization (like a political party, a presidential administration, and/or their compliant portion of the national media) are intent on and coordinating in covering up, denying, and redirecting concerns about a president’s declining mental acuity, that actually IS a conspiracy.

We like to reference our 1971 version of the Webster’s New World Dictionary when we seek an official definition. Why lean on such an old reference? Well, we feel the information in that book sufficiently predates the efforts of the modern progressive Left to redefine the meanings of vast swaths of the English language. So, we go to the 1971 meaning of “conspire”:

conspire [-SPIRED, SPIRING]

1. To plan together secretly, esp. in order to commit a crime.

2. To work together toward one end.

We know that President Biden’s mind has been failing him for years. Thanks to the combination of the cancer announcement and input from vocal medical experts, we now know that he has been dealing with advanced prostate cancer for years. On the other hand, we have heard from every vocal member of his administration, every vocal Democrat leader, every Leftist news organization, and even his own wife (really Jill?) that he was as sharp as ever, that he was a perfectly healthy 80-year-old man, that he was more than fit to fulfill his duties as president — for YEARS. Whether that was a coordinated effort or just a dutiful response to what the clear-eyed viewers of the world were seeing, that was doubtless an effort to work together toward one end. That end? Retaining power for their party and keeping power out of Donald Trump’s hands.

Whether or not a crime was committed, that actually IS a “conspiracy” per the definition of the word.

This “conspiracy theory” is not a theory at all. It is a reality.

Bringing It On Home

Democrats and their modern progressive Left cohorts had no reservations about looking backward when it came to prosecuting Donald Trump or persecuting J6 protesters. Now, they conveniently no longer want to look backward.

The Biden administration provided us with a new path for presidents to ensure that we need not even bother with looking backward on his administration — they preemptively pardoned crowds of people in the administration’s sphere, including members of his family and his political collaborators. They can no longer be charged with or prosecuted for federal crimes for the period of time covered by the pardon (which goes back a long way), so there is no need to even look back on what crimes they may have committed!

The Biden administration has now ushered in a new era of preemptive pardons. We continue to note that it was “the administration” that did this because we are not convinced that Mr. Biden had the faculties to make a determination on his own of the rightness or wrongness of such political maneuvers. In fact, we feel like a cognitively intact Joe Biden of 15 or 20 years ago might have refused such actions due to the awareness of how slippery that slope is.

And so, here we are today. This story is not just about digressionary comments by compliant Leftist stooges like Representative Jeffries. The Biden administration has created an environment in which crimes on behalf of the executive branch are permissible. Every president (including the current one) may henceforth pardon anyone preemptively, and they will have Biden to thank for that precedent. This will be the case until a law is passed to stop it and we have a president with the integrity to sign it into law. The president’s lackeys have no limits in the crimes they can commit as long as they have the support of the Commander-In-Chief. The United States of America simply has no means to curtail crime within the executive branch.

Except for precognition.

Can we meet in the middle on the idea that a president should not be allowed to have people commit limitless crimes on his/her behalf under the protection of preemptive pardons? We believe we have consensus on this subject and it is in the spirit of this consensus that we call for all patriotic clairvoyants to rise up and help protect America and the entire world from a future of unfettered crime by the most powerful person on Earth — a future that the modern progressive Left and the Democratic Party have ushered in.

To all of the clairvoyants out there: It should not take long for you to respond — you should have seen this coming!